Friday, November 16, 2012

Erin Dunn Is In The Newspaper Today

http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2012/11/portland_police_and_9-1-1_fail.html#incart_river#incart_m-rpt-2


Lack of Portland police, 9-1-1 policies for interpreters discriminates against people who are deaf, lawsuit alleges


 


 
A deaf Portland man who reported he was the victim of a domestic assault said police and 9-1-1 operators failed to respond with a sign language interpreter, hampering the police inquiry and putting him at risk.

Philip Wolfe, 39, is suing the city of Portland in federal court, alleging the city violated the Americans With Disabilities Act, which prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in state and local government services.

Wolfe's allegations highlight a gaping hole in Portland Police Bureau policy: Twenty-two years after the ADA was enacted, the bureau lacks any protocol on how to respond to people who are hearing impaired.

Wolfe is seeking a court order requiring the city to adopt uniform policies for police and emergency dispatchers to ensure sign language interpreters are supplied when a deaf crime victim or witness makes a report, requests assistance or is interviewed by police.

"During Plaintiff's contact with the police, he was overwhelmed, disoriented and hurt," his attorney Daniel Snyder wrote in the suit. "Plaintiff was unable to understand the police officers clearly."

City Commissioner Amanda Fritz, who oversees the city's 9-1-1 dispatch center, declined to comment. Sgt. Pete Simpson, Police Bureau spokesman, said the bureau doesn't have a specific policy on how to respond to hearing-impaired people. He declined to comment on the lawsuit but released the police reports in the case.
Since 2006, the U.S. Department of Justice has urged police agencies across the country to adopt effective communication policies to ensure a "consistently high level of service is provided to all community members, including those who are deaf or hard of hearing."

Under the Justice Department's model policy, police agencies would have 24-hour access to a sign language interpreting service and would use aids, such as text telephones or written notes, to help people who are hearing-impaired.

Simpson said there are volunteer translators available through the Police Bureau's Crisis Response Team, "but currently there are no sign-language interpreters."

Officers try to have people write down or type a statement, he added.
Wolfe's lawsuit stems from an April 9 call to 9-1-1 about 9:20 a.m. after Wolfe fled his Northeast Portland apartment to escape his partner, who had grabbed him by both ankles and dragged him along the floor. Because Wolfe's cell phone was almost out of power, he sent a text message to a friend, who is also deaf, asking her to contact 9-1-1.

The friend, Erin Dunn, contacted emergency dispatch through a video relay operator to report the assault. Dunn told dispatch that Wolfe, deaf since birth, needed an American Sign Language interpreter.

According to the lawsuit, the 9-1-1 operator said officers would get an interpreter if necessary. When Dunn asked for the dispatcher's name, the dispatcher said he was ending the call.

When Portland police arrived, Wolfe asked for a sign interpreter. He tried to use a laptop computer to communicate with police, but he couldn't get it to work. Wolfe wasn't aware that his partner had removed the computer's hard drive, the suit says.

Wolfe showed police a red mark on his back, but he did not understand that he could have his partner arrested, the suit says.

According to police reports, the responding officers believed Wolfe just wanted to get back into his apartment and helped him do so.

Once inside, they talked to Wolfe's partner, who was not deaf. Both men agreed they felt safe and would work things out, the police report says.

So the officers left.


Later that night, Wolfe said, his partner kicked in his locked bedroom door and tried to choke him. As Wolfe ran out of the bedroom, his partner broke a lamp, threw glasses and threatened to kill him if he left, his suit says.

Again, Wolfe sent a text message to his friend Dunn, asking her to contact 9-1-1.

She did, asking the dispatcher at 10:49 p.m. to send police and noted that Wolfe was deaf and needed an interpreter.

Wolfe met officers -- some of whom had been on the earlier call -- on the street outside. He tried to explain that his roommate had attacked him, and he asked again for an interpreter.

Police said in their reports that Wolfe was able to communicate with officers in writing and with hand motions. Yet one officer called dispatch and asked for someone who knew American Sign Language.

When Officer Heidi Brockmann arrived, she apologized to Wolfe in American Sign Language for her beginner-level sign skills. "Due to her lack of skills," the suit says, "Officer Brockmann was unable to adequately assist Plaintiff."

According to a police report, Brockmann suggested that another officer remove his car's mobile computer so Wolfe could type a statement. By that time, Wolfe was back in his apartment trying to type one on his computer.

Police took photos of Wolfe's injuries and arrested his partner on assault and harassment charges. Brockmann helped another officer communicate with Wolfe to explain how he could obtain a restraining order, the police report says.

By the time the police report was written, Officer Joseph R. Cook said he had not received Wolfe's statement. According to police, Wolfe had trouble e-mailing it. The officer offered to pick up a printout, but Wolfe did not have a printer. The statement reached police by 12:11 a.m.

Charges against Wolfe's partner were dropped in late July, when the partner committed suicide.

Wolfe's suit seeks economic damages up to $5,000 and compensatory damages for inconvenience and mental anguish.

"Just as businesses are expected to try to accommodate customers with disabilities and employers provide reasonable accommodations to allow employees with disabilities to do their job, police departments are expected to adjust to citizens who are deaf," said John Dineen, a training and information specialist with the Northwest ADA Center at the University of Washington.

-- Maxine Bernstein


Maxine Bernstein, The Oregonian

Maxine Bernstein, The Oregonian

About Me:
Bernstein has been a staff writer with The Oregonian since 1998, and covers crime, Portland police and law enforcement.


Professor Carl's comment: 



The police incident with Philip Wolfe in Portland was unfortunate.  Are we really created equal?  What about women?  Are all women created equal?



What about ASL?  Are all languages created equal, too?  The English language is known to be imperfect in respect to its inability to describe ASL fully; even more imperfect is its ability to respect and revere ASL as the language and culture of the Deaf. 

We the Deaf have a different disability.  Most disabled people speak English, and we need a language interpreters.  Our society made us to guess our best by lipreading what is spoken to us. Or we do appear uncooperative or insubordinate.  In some cases, a police brutality is justified if we use our hands in ASL.  Their rationale:  It takes the hands to kill.

 

13 comments:

  1. wow what a story. I can't believe the police Bureau does not have an interpreter, And why doesn't 911 dispatch have an interpreter this is crazy people who are deaf need help to.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is extremly unfortuante. I believe that when a deaf peson video calls into 9-1-1 they should just send the interperter to ensure that the deaf person gets the same treatment and proper steps taken to make sure they understand. I think that yes we are all created equal, being deaf just means you get to learn another languiage and have a beautiful language. People just need to come to the realization that just because someone is deaf does not make them a bad person and they need to do their best to communicate with the deaf community, even if that is writing them notes or using the correct signs for the sign language they know(if any).

    ReplyDelete
  3. I am surprised by this. I thought that every state office/services need to have all the languages covered. I can't believe that the police would do something like that! It seems like by not having the interpreter they put him at a huge risk! Some people don't consider sign language a language but so it isn't really represented very well which is unfortunate. I think that EVERY state office/service should HAVE to have an interpreter that they can call at all times! I know that at Kohls where I work we have had a family of hearing impaired and I was glad I knew a little bit of sign to talk to them.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Check this one out....
    http://deafnewstoday.blogspot.com/2012/11/wa-suit-45-million.html

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is just crazy! I don't understand why it seems like hearing impaired people are just no body. They are still human beings.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Deba explained allot of this today. How it happens often enough that Deaf people can get into hot water with cops.

    Actually, I kinda get it. I drive without my hearing aids in (hate em). So I've thought before that if I get pulled over I better put em on quick before the cop gets to me so he doesn't see me reaching for something and freak out. I never thought about it before but I guess I get it. Unfortunate fact of life.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think all police forces should be required to take a interpreter with them on calls that have a deaf person involved. His friend had stated to the police that he was deaf, it seems a no brainer to need someone to interpret. Sad to think that America really isn't as undiscriminating as we are taught to believe.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I agree, obviously the police department needs a protocol for any person seeking interpretation, but it seems kinda weird that no one had a piece of paper and a pen around (not to say the written English is a good substitute for all cases). I think in this situation that would have worked perfectly seeing how he wanted to try and type to the officers. Having said that, the person who called 9-1-1 stated that the man was deaf; they need to be prepared for the future when giving them something to write on isn't possible.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This is just stupid. Why wouldn't they care to have a highly skilled interpreter available? I guess this just goes to show more of us need to learn the language and become professional interpreters.

    ReplyDelete
  10. People with disabilities who whish to be active members of their society (or even live in this world at all) have to work that much harder to keep up with the rest of the world and conform to its standerds.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your right Steven, and this is burdening. Yet somehow I want to keep thinking as I do, that these people are probably more often stronger and even more empowered than the "un-disabled" person. Just because they do have to work that much harder with sometimes less credit given.

      Delete
    2. Just like other situations that have happened in the past I hope this one opens the door to a whole new awareness!!!

      Delete
  11. WOW, what a sad story! I can't believe the police allow this to happen. It doesn't seem right. They have no problem having translators for other languages readily available, so why not for the deaf? I find this really upsetting and it doesn't make my ill feelings towards police any better! Our society really needs to wake up and become more responsive to the people around us. Equality means equal rights for everyone! Ne exceptions!!!

    ReplyDelete